GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs CMP 100HX 210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1725MHz vs 1147MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
CMP 100HX 210 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
CMP 100HX 210
+166%
11750
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
555 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
80
1280
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GV100
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
