GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (2100MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+1750%
81720
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
1216
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
153 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
