GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 9060 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 9060 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Radeon RX 9060 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (3230MHz vs 1725MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (322.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416
Radeon RX 9060 XT
+499%
26460
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2025
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
2220 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
3230 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
322.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
20
SM Count
48
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.7 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
413.4 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.92 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.46 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
826.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Navi 44
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 44 XT
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
284 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8