GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 680M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 58% (1200MHz vs 758MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+20%
2458
GeForce GTX 680M
2038
Blender
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+207%
581
GeForce GTX 680M
189
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+47%
62
GeForce GTX 680M
42
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
719 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.22 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.90 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.038 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.90 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK104
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
