GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 965M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1335MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+74%
4101
GeForce GTX 965M
2355
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+176%
4973
GeForce GTX 965M
1800
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+188%
2304
GeForce GTX 965M
798
Blender
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+554%
870
GeForce GTX 965M
133
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+246%
111
GeForce GTX 965M
32
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2016
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
935 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GM206S
-
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
