GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+37%
4101
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2989
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1792
96
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3