GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1680MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4101
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+697%
32690
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
76
1536
Shading Units
9728
96
TMUs
304
48
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
120W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
AD103
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
