GeForce GTX 295 vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
+243%
2048
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
64
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
