GeForce GTX 295 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+1686%
10650
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
256
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
