GeForce GTX 295 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1913%
12000
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
22
240
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
28
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD107
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
