GeForce GTX 295 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+4384%
26730
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
160bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
48
240
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD104
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
