GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
+2%
2209
Radeon E9260 MXM
2150
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 600M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
1536
Shading Units
896
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
23.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
92.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
2.209 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
92.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Baffin
N13E-GTX2-A2
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4