GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition vs RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
2209
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+607%
15620
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
36
1536
Shading Units
4608
128
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
92.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.62 TFLOPS
2.209 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.62 TFLOPS
92.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
244.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
115W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
AD106
N13E-GTX2-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
