GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1200MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+208%
2458
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+191%
3150
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+543%
1429
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+706%
581
OctaneBench
GeForce MX250
22
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+181%
62
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
