GeForce RTX 4080 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
9088 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+2839%
48740
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1658
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce RTX 4080
+1802%
28173
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1481
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce RTX 4080
+2841%
14002
Radeon Pro WX 3200
476
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
640
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
320W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Polaris 23
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
