Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

VS

Intel Celeron 7305

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron 7305 with 5 cores 1.1GHz and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U with 2 cores 2.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron 7305 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (8MB vs 4MB)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Lower TDP (15W vs 25W)

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 1.1GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron 7305

546

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U +68%

920

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron 7305

1248

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U +43%

1791

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron 7305

426

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U +96%

838

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron 7305

1240

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U +26%

1569

Intel Celeron 7305

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

General Parameters

Jan 2022

Release Date

Jan 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Zen+

7305

Processor Number

-

BGA-1744

Socket

FP5

UHD Graphics (48 EU)

Integrated Graphics

Radeon RX Vega 3

Package

-

Transistor Count

4.94 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

12-15 W

Power Consumption

12-25 W

55 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

100°C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

CPU Performance

1

Performance Cores

2

1

Performance Core Threads

4

1.1 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.6 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.5 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

0.9 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

5

Total Core Count

2

5

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

11x

Multiplier

26x

80 K per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

8 MB shared

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

64 GB

Max Memory Size

32 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

38.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

1100 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1200 MHz

-

Shader Units

192

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Execution Units

3

-

Power Consumption

15 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.54 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron 7305

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

4.0

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

8

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Pentium Gold 4417U

2

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Core i7 1270P

3

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

4

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Core i9 13900HX

5

Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

6

Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

7

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Core i3 7020U

8

Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7545U

9

Intel Celeron 7305 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

10

Intel Celeron 7305 vs Intel Processor N200

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster