Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

VS

Intel Celeron G6900

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G6900 with 2 cores 3.4GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 2500X with 4 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron G6900 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 4 months late

Integrated graphics card

Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 12nm)

Lower TDP (46W vs 65W)

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 's Advantages

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.4GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 4MB)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron G6900 +35%

1666

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

1234

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron G6900

2676

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X +59%

4269

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron G6900 +34%

1303

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

971

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron G6900

2535

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X +53%

3880

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron G6900 +15%

2674

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

2313

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron G6900

4402

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X +115%

9465

Intel Celeron G6900

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

General Parameters

Jan 2022

Release Date

Sep 2018

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Zen+

G6900

Processor Number

-

LGA-1700

Socket

AM4

UHD Graphics 710

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Package

-

Transistor Count

4.8 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

12 nm

46 W

Power Consumption

65 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

4

2

Performance Core Threads

8

3.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

2

Total Core Count

4

2

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

34x

Multiplier

36x

80 K per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

4 MB shared

L3 Cache

16 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

Memory Types

DDR4-2933

128 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

43.71 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1300 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

128

Shader Units

-

8

Texture Units

-

8

Raster Operation Units

-

16

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

0.36 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron G6900

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i3 13100F

2

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i7 14700T

3

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i5 13600KF

4

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i9 10920X

5

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core 7 150HL

6

Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

7

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core 5 120HL

8

Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

9

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i7 11700F

10

Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster