Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285

VS

Intel Celeron J4005

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4005 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 24 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4005 's Advantages

Lower TDP (10W vs 125W)

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 10 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 35.76GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

Intel Celeron J4005

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

General Parameters

Dec 2017

Release Date

Oct 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Gemini Lake

Core Architecture

Arrow Lake-S

J4005

Processor Number

-

BGA-1090

Socket

Intel Socket 1851

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

-

Generation

Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

10 W

Power Consumption

125 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

-

Foundry

Intel

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

8

2

Performance Core Threads

16

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.5 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.6 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

16

-

Efficiency Core Threads

16

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

1900 MHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4.6 GHz

2

Total Core Count

24

2

Total Thread Count

24

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

-

Multiplier

25.0

48 K per core

L1 Cache

112 KB per core

4 MB per core

L2 Cache

3 MB per core

-

L3 Cache

36 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR5-5600

8 GB

Max Memory Size

256 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

35.76 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

600 MHz

700 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1800 MHz

96

Shader Units

512

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

4

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

1.79 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4005

Official Website

2.0

PCIe Version

5

6

PCIe Lanes

16

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i7 12700T

2

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Celeron G5900

3

Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

4

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i3 9100

5

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i7 9700KF

6

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i3 13100TE

7

Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 7 1800X

8

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Pentium G4600

9

Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

10

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Core i5 10400F

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game