Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

VS

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT with 6 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 2 months late

Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR4-2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (51.2GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (3 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4025

395

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT +410%

2017

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4025

675

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT +1109%

8165

Intel Celeron J4025

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

General Parameters

Nov 2019

Release Date

Jan 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Gemini Lake Refresh

Core Architecture

Cezanne

J4025

Processor Number

-

BGA-1090

Socket

AMD Socket AM4

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

Radeon Vega 7

-

Generation

Ryzen 5 (Zen 3 (Cezanne))

Package

-

Transistor Count

10.7 billions

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

BGA-1090

Socket

AMD Socket AM4

10 W

Power Consumption

65 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

-

Foundry

TSMC

-

Die Size

180 mm²

-

Package

µOPGA-1331

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

-

2

Performance Core Threads

-

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

2.9 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.4 GHz

2

Total Core Count

6

2

Total Thread Count

12

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

20x

Multiplier

36.0

32 K per core

L1 Cache

64 KB per core

4 MB shared

L2 Cache

512 KB per core

-

L3 Cache

16 MB

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR4-3200

8 GB

Max Memory Size

-

2

Max Memory Channels

2

38.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

51.2 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

700 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4025

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

2.0

PCIe Version

3

6

PCIe Lanes

16

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Celeron J4025

2

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 vs Intel Celeron J4025

3

Intel Core i3 9100 vs Intel Celeron J4025

4

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs Intel Celeron J4025

5

Intel Core i9 11900F vs Intel Celeron J4025

6

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Celeron J4025

7

Intel Core i5 12600KF vs Intel Celeron J4025

8

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

9

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

10

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 8500

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD