Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

VS

Intel Celeron J4025

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with 12 cores 4.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages

Lower TDP (10W vs 170W)

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 10 months late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (4.7GHz vs 2.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4025

395

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X +644%

2942

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4025

675

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X +2728%

19092

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron J4025

476

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X +378%

2277

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4025

888

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X +2208%

20503

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron J4025

1224

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X +252%

4317

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron J4025

1704

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X +2952%

52013

Intel Celeron J4025

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

General Parameters

Nov 2019

Release Date

Sep 2022

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Gemini Lake Refresh

Core Architecture

Raphael

J4025

Processor Number

-

BGA-1090

Socket

AM5

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

AMD Radeon™ Graphics

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

5 nm

10 W

Power Consumption

170 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

12

2

Performance Core Threads

24

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

4.7 GHz

2.9 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.6 GHz

2

Total Core Count

12

2

Total Thread Count

24

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

20x

Multiplier

47x

32 K per core

L1 Cache

-

4 MB shared

L2 Cache

12 MB shared

-

L3 Cache

64 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR5-5200

8 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

38.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

83.2 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

-

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

700 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4025

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

2.0

PCIe Version

5.0

6

PCIe Lanes

24

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 12700K

2

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Celeron P1053

3

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

4

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT

5

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Celeron G5900T

6

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 7900X

7

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

9

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 9700T

10

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 10850K

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster