Home Comparison Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 13600K

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 13600K

Intel Celeron J4025
VS
Intel Core i5 13600K
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Core i5 13600K
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core i5 13600K with 14 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 125W)
Intel Core i5 13600K 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (89.6GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4025
395
Intel Core i5 13600K +581%
2692
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4025
675
Intel Core i5 13600K +2268%
15985
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4025
476
Intel Core i5 13600K +320%
2002
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4025
888
Intel Core i5 13600K +1715%
16119
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Celeron J4025
1224
Intel Core i5 13600K +240%
4162
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4025
1704
Intel Core i5 13600K +2143%
38230
Intel Celeron J4025
VS
Intel Core i5 13600K

General Parameters

Nov 2019
Release Date
Sep 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Gemini Lake Refresh
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
J4025
Processor Number
i5-13600K
BGA-1090
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
125 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
181 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
6
2
Performance Core Threads
12
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
8
-
Efficiency Core Threads
8
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
2
Total Core Count
14
2
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
35x
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
4 MB shared
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
8 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
38.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
200 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
700 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1500 MHz
96
Shader Units
256
12
Texture Units
16
2
Raster Operation Units
8
12
Execution Units
32
5 W
Power Consumption
15 W
3840x2160 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.14 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4025
Official Website
Intel Core i5 13600K
2.0
PCIe Version
5.0
6
PCIe Lanes
20
SSE4.2
Extended Instruction Set
-

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 12700F
2
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 11900KF
3
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
4
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 4750GE
5
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 11700KF
6
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 7800X
7
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 3 4100
8
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 9500
9
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 11500
10
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 14400F

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy