Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

VS

Intel Celeron J4025

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core Ultra 5 225F with 10 cores 3.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 11 months late

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.3GHz vs 2.0GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)

Score

Intel Celeron J4025

VS

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

General Parameters

Nov 2019

Release Date

Oct 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

-

Gemini Lake Refresh

Core Architecture

Arrow Lake-S

J4025

Processor Number

-

BGA-1090

Socket

Intel Socket 1851

UHD Graphics 600

Integrated Graphics

N/A

-

Generation

Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

10 W

Power Consumption

65 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

-

Foundry

Intel

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

6

2

Performance Core Threads

12

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.3 GHz

2.9 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.9 GHz

-

Efficiency Cores

4

-

Efficiency Core Threads

4

-

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

2.7 GHz

-

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

4.4 GHz

2

Total Core Count

10

2

Total Thread Count

10

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

20x

Multiplier

33.0

32 K per core

L1 Cache

112 KB per core

4 MB shared

L2 Cache

3 MB per core

-

L3 Cache

21 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

-

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR5-5600

8 GB

Max Memory Size

256 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

38.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

102.4 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

700 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

96

Shader Units

-

12

Texture Units

-

2

Raster Operation Units

-

12

Execution Units

-

5 W

Power Consumption

-

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.14 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4025

Official Website

2.0

PCIe Version

5

6

PCIe Lanes

16

SSE4.2

Extended Instruction Set

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 8600K

2

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 7960X

3

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 10700T

4

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i3 12300T

5

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core 7 160HL

6

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240

7

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 6785R

8

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 11600

9

Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1400

10

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i3 12100E

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU