Home Comparison Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Intel Celeron J4025
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Intel Celeron J4025
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with 20 cores 3.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 125W)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2400)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.9GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J4025
395
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +698%
3156
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J4025
675
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K +3065%
21364
Intel Celeron J4025
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

General Parameters

Nov 2019
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Gemini Lake Refresh
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
J4025
Processor Number
265K
BGA-1090
Socket
FCLGA-1851
UHD Graphics 600
Integrated Graphics
Arc Xe2 (Arrow Lake-S)
-
Generation
Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Package

14 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
125 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
250 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
-
Foundry
TSMC

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
8
2
Performance Core Threads
8
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
12
-
Efficiency Core Threads
12
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
2
Total Core Count
20
2
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
39
32 K per core
L1 Cache
112 K per core
4 MB shared
L2 Cache
3 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
30 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
-
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
8 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
38.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
true
200 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
700 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
2000 MHz
96
Shader Units
512
12
Texture Units
16
2
Raster Operation Units
8
12
Execution Units
64
5 W
Power Consumption
-
3840x2160 - 30 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.14 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
2.05 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron J4025
Official Website
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
2.0
PCIe Version
5.0
6
PCIe Lanes
24
SSE4.2
Extended Instruction Set
-

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 7640X
2
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i9 12900E
3
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i3 12100TE
5
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
6
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600
7
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i5 14400
8
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3955WX
9
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Pentium 350
10
Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Core i7 7700T

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy