Intel Celeron N3060 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100

VS

Intel Celeron N3060

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-78-100)

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N3060 with 2 cores 1.6GHz and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100 with 12 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron N3060 's Advantages

Lower TDP (6W vs 35W)

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 1600)

Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 25.6GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 1.6GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (42MB vs 2MB)

More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron N3060

115

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100 +1940%

2347

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3060

209

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100 +6261%

13296

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron N3060

622

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100 +408%

3163

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3060

652

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100 +3386%

22734

Intel Celeron N3060

VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100

General Parameters

Jan 2016

Release Date

Oct 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

Qualcomm

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

ARMv8

Braswell

Core Architecture

Snapdragon X

N3060

Processor Number

X1E-78-100

BGA-1170

Socket

Custom

HD Graphics 400

Integrated Graphics

Qualcomm Adreno X1

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

4 nm

6 W

Power Consumption

35 W

-

Max Turbo Power Consumption

45 W

90 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

12

2

Performance Core Threads

12

1.6 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.4 GHz

2

Total Core Count

12

2

Total Thread Count

12

-

Multiplier

34x

48 K per core

L1 Cache

-

1 MB per core

L2 Cache

-

2 MB shared

L3 Cache

42 MB

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR3L-1600

Memory Types

LPDDR5x-8448

8 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

8

25.6 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

135 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

500 MHz

600 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1200 MHz

-

Shader Units

1536

-

Texture Units

48

-

Raster Operation Units

6

-

Execution Units

6

-

Graphics Performance

3.8 TFLOPS

AI Accelerator

-

NPU

Qualcomm Hexagon NPU

-

Theoretical performance

45 TOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron N3060

Official Website

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E 78 100

2.0

PCIe Version

4.0

4

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core i5 11300H

2

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Processor N200

3

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core i3 N305

4

Intel Celeron N3060 vs AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS

5

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Celeron N4120

6

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Celeron N4000

7

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Core i5 1035G1

8

Intel Celeron N3060 vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

9

Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Celeron N3350

10

Intel Celeron N3060 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster