Intel Celeron N3350 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

VS

Intel Celeron N3350

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N3350 with 2 cores 1.1GHz and AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX with 12 cores 3.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron N3350 's Advantages

Lower TDP (6W vs 75W)

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 5 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 29.9GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (3.0GHz vs 1.1GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Celeron N3350

189

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +886%

1864

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3350

262

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +10068%

26641

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron N3350

253

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +927%

2600

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3350

255

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +4939%

12851

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron N3350

328

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +525%

2052

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3350

625

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX +2570%

16693

Intel Celeron N3350

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

General Parameters

Aug 2016

Release Date

Jan 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Apollo Lake

Core Architecture

Zen 4 (Dragon Range)

N3350

Processor Number

-

BGA-1296

Socket

FL1

HD Graphics 500

Integrated Graphics

Radeon 610M

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

5 nm

6 W

Power Consumption

45-75 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

12

2

Performance Core Threads

24

1.1 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.0 GHz

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.2 GHz

2

Total Core Count

12

2

Total Thread Count

24

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

-

Multiplier

30x

48 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

1 MB per core

-

L3 Cache

64 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR5-5200

8 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

29.9 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

83.2 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

1500 MHz

650 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2200 MHz

96

Shader Units

128

12

Texture Units

8

2

Raster Operation Units

4

12

Execution Units

2

6 W

Power Consumption

15 W

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.12 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.49 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron N3350

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

2.0

PCIe Version

5.0

6

PCIe Lanes

28

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i7 11375H

2

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i7 13700H

3

Intel Celeron N3350 vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

4

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i5 8400H

5

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i5 11300H

6

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i3 1005G1

7

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i5 1145G7

8

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i3 1220P

9

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i7 7700HQ

10

Intel Celeron N3350 vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900H

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster