Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Pentium Gold 7505

VS

Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Pentium Gold 7505

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N3350 with 2 cores 1.1GHz and Intel Pentium Gold 7505 with 2 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron N3350 's Advantages

Lower TDP (6W vs 15W)

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 2 months late

Better graphics card performance

Higher specification of memory (3733 vs 2400)

Newer PCIe version (3.0 vs 2.0)

Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.1GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron N3350

253

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 +347%

1133

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3350

255

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 +771%

2222

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Celeron N3350

328

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 +199%

981

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3350

625

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 +258%

2240

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron N3350

798

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 +187%

2296

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron N3350

1104

Intel Pentium Gold 7505 +375%

5246

Intel Celeron N3350

VS

Intel Pentium Gold 7505

General Parameters

Aug 2016

Release Date

Oct 2020

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Apollo Lake

Core Architecture

Tiger Lake

N3350

Processor Number

7505

BGA-1296

Socket

BGA-1449

HD Graphics 500

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

6 W

Power Consumption

15 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

CPU Performance

2

Performance Cores

2

Performance Core Threads

4

1.1 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.5 GHz

2

Total Core Count

2

Total Thread Count

4

-

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

-

Multiplier

20x

48 K per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

1256 K per core

-

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733

8 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

29.9 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

-

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

650 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1250 MHz

96

Shader Units

384

12

Texture Units

24

2

Raster Operation Units

12

Execution Units

48

6 W

Power Consumption

15 W

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.12 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

0.84 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron N3350

Official Website

Intel Pentium Gold 7505

2.0

PCIe Version

3.0

6

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron N3350 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

2

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i7 1280P

3

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Atom x7 Z8750

4

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i7 8557U

5

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i7 8850H

6

Intel Celeron N3350 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

7

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i5 1335U

8

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Apple M2 Pro

9

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i5 14450HX

10

Intel Celeron N3350 vs Intel Core i3 5010U

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster