Intel Celeron N5095 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

VS

Intel Celeron N5095

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N5095 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS with 8 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron N5095 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Lower TDP (15W vs 54W)

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 3 months late

Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2.0GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 4MB)

More modern manufacturing process (6nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Celeron N5095

609

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS +142%

1477

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N5095

2174

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS +534%

13804

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Celeron N5095

503

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS +299%

2009

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Celeron N5095

1449

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS +574%

9773

Blender

Intel Celeron N5095

13

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS +1292%

181

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Celeron N5095

1500

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS +113%

3204

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Celeron N5095

4000

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS +495%

23830

Intel Celeron N5095

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

General Parameters

Jan 2021

Release Date

Apr 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Amd

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Jasper Lake

Core Architecture

Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)

N5095

Processor Number

-

BGA-1338

Socket

FP7

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Integrated Graphics

No

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

6 nm

15 W

Power Consumption

35-54 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

CPU Performance

4

Performance Cores

8

4

Performance Core Threads

16

2.0 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.1 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.5 GHz

4

Total Core Count

8

4

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

20x

Multiplier

31

-

L1 Cache

64 K per core

384 K per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

4 MB shared

L3 Cache

16 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x-2933

Memory Types

DDR5-4800

16 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

45.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

76.8 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

-

350 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

750 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

256

Shader Units

-

16

Texture Units

-

8

Raster Operation Units

-

16

Execution Units

-

6 W

Power Consumption

-

0.24 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Celeron N5095

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

3.0

PCIe Version

4.0

8

PCIe Lanes

20

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165U

2

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core i5 8257U

3

Intel Celeron N5095 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

4

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

5

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core i7 13620H

6

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Apple M4 Max 14 Cores

7

Intel Celeron N5095 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

8

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Pentium Gold 6405U

9

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core i7 10810U

10

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core i9 14900HX

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster