Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5620

VS

Intel Core i5 8400

Intel Pentium Gold G5620

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 8400 with 6 cores 2.8GHz and Intel Pentium Gold G5620 with 2 cores 4.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i5 8400 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (41.6GB/s vs 37.5GB/s)

Larger L3 cache size (9MB vs 4MB)

Intel Pentium Gold G5620 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 6 months late

Higher base frequency (4.0GHz vs 2.8GHz)

Lower TDP (54W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i5 8400 +70%

1298

Intel Pentium Gold G5620

763

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 8400 +221%

4677

Intel Pentium Gold G5620

1456

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Core i5 8400 +14%

1032

Intel Pentium Gold G5620

903

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i5 8400 +160%

4611

Intel Pentium Gold G5620

1773

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Core i5 8400

2387

Intel Pentium Gold G5620 +1%

2420

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Core i5 8400 +126%

9214

Intel Pentium Gold G5620

4064

Intel Core i5 8400

VS

Intel Pentium Gold G5620

General Parameters

Oct 2017

Release Date

Apr 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Coffee Lake

Core Architecture

Coffee Lake

i5-8400

Processor Number

G5620

LGA-1151

Socket

LGA-1151

UHD Graphics 630

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 630

Package

14 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

54 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

2

6

Performance Core Threads

4

2.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

4.0 GHz

4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

6

Total Core Count

2

6

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

28x

Multiplier

-

64 K per core

L1 Cache

-

256 K per core

L2 Cache

-

9 MB shared

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666

Memory Types

DDR4-2400

128 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

41.6 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

37.5 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

350 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1050 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1100 MHz

192

Shader Units

-

24

Texture Units

-

3

Raster Operation Units

-

24

Execution Units

-

15 W

Power Consumption

-

4096x2304 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

0.38 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i5 8400

Official Website

Intel Pentium Gold G5620

3.0

PCIe Version

3.0

16

PCIe Lanes

16

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155HL

2

Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350GE

3

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i5 7400

4

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i5 10500

5

Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1500X

6

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i7 9800X

7

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i7 9700

8

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Pentium Gold G5420T

9

Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

10

Intel Core i5 8400 vs Intel Core i7 14790F

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster