Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i5 1030G4

VS

Intel Core i7 12850HX Intel Core i5 1030G4

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core i7 12850HX with 16 cores 2.1GHz and Intel Core i5 1030G4 with 4 cores 0.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i7 12850HX 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 9 months late

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 58.3GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 0.7GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (25MB vs 6MB)

Intel Core i5 1030G4 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (LPDDR4-3733 vs DDR5-4800)

Lower TDP (9W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Core i7 12850HX +68%

1788

Intel Core i5 1030G4

1064

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i7 12850HX +429%

14589

Intel Core i5 1030G4

2757

Intel Core i7 12850HX

VS

Intel Core i5 1030G4

General Parameters

May 2022

Release Date

Aug 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake-HX

Core Architecture

Ice Lake

i7-12850HX

Processor Number

i5-1030G4

BGA-1744

Socket

BGA-1440

UHD Graphics (32EU)

Integrated Graphics

Iris Plus Graphics G4

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

BGA-1744

Socket

BGA-1440

45-55 W

Power Consumption

9 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

4

-

Performance Core Threads

8

2.1 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

0.7 GHz

4.8 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

3.5 GHz

8

Efficiency Cores

-

16

Total Core Count

4

24

Total Thread Count

8

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

21x

Multiplier

7x

80 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

1280 K per core

L2 Cache

256 K per core

25 MB shared

L3 Cache

6 MB shared

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200

Memory Types

LPDDR4-3733

128 GB

Max Memory Size

32 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

58.3 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

300 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

1450 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1050 MHz

256

Shader Units

-

16

Texture Units

-

8

Raster Operation Units

-

32

Execution Units

-

45 W

Power Consumption

-

0.74 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core i7 12850HX

Official Website

Intel Core i5 1030G4

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i7 13850HX

2

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i7 11850H

3

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i5 14450HX

4

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i3 1125G4

5

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i7 8850H

6

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

7

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i7 10870H

8

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U vs Intel Core i7 12850HX

9

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i3 1220P

10

Intel Core i7 12850HX vs Intel Core i5 1240P

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD