Intel Core i9 12900F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

VS

Intel Core i9 12900F

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 12900F with 16 cores 2.4GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX with 96 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 12900F 's Advantages

Lower TDP (65W vs 350W)

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 9 months late

Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 4800)

Larger memory bandwidth (332.8GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)

Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2.4GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 30MB)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core i9 12900F +3%

1988

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

1927

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core i9 12900F

26455

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX +279%

100295

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core i9 12900F

2572

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX +8%

2780

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core i9 12900F

13687

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX +85%

25395

Blender

Intel Core i9 12900F

223

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX +856%

2133

Intel Core i9 12900F

VS

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

General Parameters

Jan 2022

Release Date

Oct 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

Alder Lake-S

Core Architecture

Storm Peak

Intel Socket 1700

Socket

AMD Socket sTR5

N/A

Integrated Graphics

N/A

Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)

Generation

Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 4 (Storm Peak))

Package

-

Transistor Count

78.84 billions

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

5 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

350 W

72 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

-

Intel

Foundry

TSMC

215 mm²

Die Size

12x71 mm²

-

I/O Process Size

6 nm

-

I/O Die Size

388 mm²

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

-

16

Performance Core Threads

-

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.5 GHz

5.1 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

5.1 GHz

8

Efficiency Cores

-

8

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1800 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

3.8 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

16

Total Core Count

96

24

Total Thread Count

192

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

24.0

Multiplier

25.0

80 KB per core

L1 Cache

64 KB per core

1.25 MB per core

L2 Cache

96 MB

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

384 MB

Yes

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800

Memory Types

DDR5-5200

-

Max Memory Size

2 TB

2

Max Memory Channels

8

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

332.8 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

5

PCIe Version

5

20

PCIe Lanes

128

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core i9 12900F vs Intel Core i7 9700K

2

Intel Core i9 12900F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

3

Intel Core i9 12900F vs Intel Core i5 14500

4

Intel Core i9 12900F vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

5

Intel Core i9 12900F vs Intel Core i9 12900KF

6

Intel Core i9 12900F vs Intel Core i5 7600K

7

Intel Core i9 12900F vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

8

Intel Core i9 12900F vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT

9

Intel Core i9 12900F vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

10

Intel Core i9 12900F vs Intel Pentium J3710

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster