Home Comparison Intel Core i9 13900 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

Intel Core i9 13900 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 13900 with 24 cores 2.0GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX with 32 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 13900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 4.0)
Lower TDP (65W vs 280W)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX 's Advantages
Larger memory bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 36MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +76%
2190
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1244
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900
35774
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +21%
43450
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +86%
3006
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1615
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +11%
19064
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
17022
Cinebench 2024 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900
1622
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +54%
2504
Blender
Intel Core i9 13900
493
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +32%
653
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +65%
2111
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1277
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900
21870
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +21%
26498
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i9 13900 +63%
4339
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
2661
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i9 13900
47914
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +30%
62727
VS

General Parameters

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jul 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake
Core Architecture
Zen 2
i9-13900
Processor Number
-
LGA-1700
Socket
sWRX8
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated Graphics
N/A

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
280 W
219 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
90 °C

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
32
16
Performance Core Threads
64
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
16
Efficiency Cores
-
16
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
24
Total Core Count
32
32
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
35x
80 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
192 GB
Max Memory Size
2048 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
8
89.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1650 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
256
Shader Units
-
16
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
32
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.78 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-

Miscellaneous

5.0
PCIe Version
4.0
20
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy