Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Apple M4 Max 16 Cores

VS

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Apple M4 Max 16 Cores

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H with 14 cores 1.2GHz and Apple M4 Max 16 Cores with 16 cores 4.41GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Apple M4 Max 16 Cores 's Advantages

Released 10 months late

Higher specification of memory (8533 vs 7467)

Larger memory bandwidth (546GB/s vs 120GB/s)

Higher base frequency (4.41GHz vs 1.2GHz)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 7nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

1671

Apple M4 Max 16 Cores +26%

2114

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

13689

Apple M4 Max 16 Cores +108%

28494

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

2224

Apple M4 Max 16 Cores +71%

3819

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

11536

Apple M4 Max 16 Cores +123%

25732

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

VS

Apple M4 Max 16 Cores

General Parameters

Dec 2023

Release Date

Oct 2024

Intel

Manufacturer

Apple

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

ARMv9

Meteor Lake

Core Architecture

Apple M4

125H

Processor Number

-

FCBGA-2049

Socket

Apple M-Socket

Arc Graphics (7-Cores)

Integrated Graphics

Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)

Ultra 5 (Meteor Lake)

Generation

-

Package

7 nm

Manufacturing Process

3 nm

20-65 W

Power Consumption

-

115 W

Max Turbo Power Consumption

-

110°C

Peak Operating Temperature

100 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

4

Performance Cores

12

8

Performance Core Threads

12

1.2 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

4.41 GHz

4.5 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

10

Efficiency Cores

4

10

Efficiency Core Threads

4

0.7 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

2.89 GHz

3.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

14

Total Core Count

16

18

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

12x

Multiplier

44

112 K per core

L1 Cache

-

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

-

18 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600

Memory Types

LPDDR5X-8533

96 GB

Max Memory Size

128 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

8

120 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

546 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

2200 MHz

GPU Base Frequency

-

2200 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

-

112

Shader Units

-

7

Texture Units

-

4

Raster Operation Units

-

7

Execution Units

-

7680x4320 - 60 Hz

Max Resolution

-

4.92 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Official Website

-

5.0

PCIe Version

-

28

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

2

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Core i5 9300H

3

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen 3 7320U

4

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Core i7 1165G7

5

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

6

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen 9 8940H

7

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme

8

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

9

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Core i7 1255U

10

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Processor U300

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster