Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz and AMD Ryzen 3 3200G with 4 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 4 months late

Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 43.71GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)

Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 4MB)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 12nm)

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.4GHz)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

General Parameters

Jan 2025

Release Date

Sep 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Picasso

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

AM4

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Integrated Graphics

Radeon Vega 8

Ultra 7(Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

17.8 billions

Transistor Count

4.9 billions

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

12 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

45-65 W

105°C

Peak Operating Temperature

95 °C

TSMC

Foundry

-

243 mm²

Die Size

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

4

16

Performance Core Threads

4

2.4 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.6 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1800 MHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

4

20

Total Thread Count

4

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

24.0

Multiplier

36x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

96 K per core

3 MB per core

L2 Cache

512 K per core

30 MB shared

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-2933

256 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

43.71 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

300 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1250 MHz

-

Shader Units

512

-

Texture Units

32

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Execution Units

8

-

Power Consumption

65 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 60 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

1.13 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

5

PCIe Version

3.0

20

PCIe Lanes

8

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285T

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Celeron G6900

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 10600K

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5 11600

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3945WX

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i7 14790F

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Celeron P1053

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game