Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 1600X with 6 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 39.74GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 95W)
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Dec 2024
Release Date
Apr 2017
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
AM4
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)
Generation
-

Package

-
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
95 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
95 °C
Intel
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
6
8
Performance Core Threads
12
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
-
12
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
20
Total Core Count
6
20
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15
Multiplier
36x
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
23 MB
L2 Cache
512 K per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
256 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
39.74 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
5
PCIe Version
3.0
PCIe Lanes
24

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy