Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Celeron G1101
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Celeron G1101 with 2 cores 2.266GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 1066)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.266GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 2MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 73W)
Score
General Parameters
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2010
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Clarkdale
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1156
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Intel HD
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Celeron (Clarkdale)
Package
17.8 billions
Transistor Count
0.382 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
73 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
243 mm²
Die Size
81 mm²
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
-
16
Performance Core Threads
-
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
12
Efficiency Cores
-
12
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1800 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
20
Total Core Count
2
20
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
17.0
192 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
2 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR3-1066
256 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
2
20
PCIe Lanes
16
