Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Celeron J4025

VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

Intel Celeron J4025

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Celeron J4025 with 2 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 1 months late

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2400)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 38.4GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)

More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)

Intel Celeron J4025 's Advantages

Integrated graphics card

Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.5GHz)

Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

VS

Intel Celeron J4025

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Nov 2019

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Desktop

Type

Desktop

-

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake-S

Core Architecture

Gemini Lake Refresh

-

Processor Number

J4025

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

BGA-1090

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics 600

Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)

Generation

-

Package

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

14 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

10 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

2

8

Performance Core Threads

2

1.5 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

2.0 GHz

5.3 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

2.9 GHz

12

Efficiency Cores

-

12

Efficiency Core Threads

-

1.2 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4.5 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

20

Total Core Count

2

20

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

15

Multiplier

20x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

32 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB shared

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400

256 GB

Max Memory Size

8 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

38.4 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

-

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

200 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

700 MHz

-

Shader Units

96

-

Texture Units

12

-

Raster Operation Units

2

-

Execution Units

12

-

Power Consumption

5 W

-

Max Resolution

3840x2160 - 30 Hz

-

Graphics Performance

0.14 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

Intel Celeron J4025

5

PCIe Version

2.0

PCIe Lanes

6

-

Extended Instruction Set

SSE4.2

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core 3 100HL

2

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Pentium Gold G6600

3

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 8700

4

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Processor 300

5

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 8600K

6

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 12900TE

7

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

8

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

9

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 13700KF

10

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 11900KF

Related News

1

AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!

2

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

3

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

4

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

5

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

6

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

7

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

8

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

9

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

10

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market