Home Comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 13900K

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 13900K

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
VS
Intel Core i9 13900K
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Intel Core i9 13900K
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 1.5GHz and Intel Core i9 13900K with 24 cores 3.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5600)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 89.6GB/s)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)
Intel Core i9 13900K 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)
Higher base frequency (3.0GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 24MB)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
VS
Intel Core i9 13900K

General Parameters

Dec 2024
Release Date
Sep 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
-
Processor Number
i9-13900K
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
LGA-1700
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)
Generation
-

Package

3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
125 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
253 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
Intel
Foundry
-

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
16
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.0 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
16
12
Efficiency Core Threads
16
1.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
20
Total Core Count
24
20
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15
Multiplier
30x
112 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
23 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
256 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website
Intel Core i9 13900K
5
PCIe Version
5.0
PCIe Lanes
20

Related CPU Comparisons

1
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 7600K
2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 12400
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 14700
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 14600KF
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 13900F
7
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 13700KF
10
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i5 11500

Related News

1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy