Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Celeron N4500

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

Intel Celeron N4500

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H with 16 cores 3.7GHz and Intel Celeron N4500 with 2 cores 1.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 11 months late

Higher specification of memory (7467 vs 2933)

Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)

Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3.0)

Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 1.1GHz)

Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 4MB)

More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Intel Celeron N4500 's Advantages

Lower TDP (6W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +322%

1909

Intel Celeron N4500

452

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +2783%

20389

Intel Celeron N4500

707

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +417%

2667

Intel Celeron N4500

515

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H +1637%

15321

Intel Celeron N4500

882

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

VS

Intel Celeron N4500

General Parameters

Dec 2024

Release Date

Jan 2021

Intel

Manufacturer

Intel

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Arrow Lake

Core Architecture

Jasper Lake

285H

Processor Number

N4500

FCLGA-1851

Socket

BGA-1338

Arc Graphics

Integrated Graphics

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Package

5 nm

Manufacturing Process

10 nm

65 W

Power Consumption

6 W

105 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

CPU Performance

6

Performance Cores

2

6

Performance Core Threads

2

3.7 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

1.1 GHz

5.4 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

-

10

Efficiency Cores

-

10

Efficiency Core Threads

-

0 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

-

16

Total Core Count

2

16

Total Thread Count

2

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

37

Multiplier

11x

-

L1 Cache

32 K per core

2 MB per core

L2 Cache

384 K per core

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

4 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

Memory Parameters

LPDDR5-7467,LPDDR5x-7467,DDR5-5600

Memory Types

DDR4-2933

192 GB

Max Memory Size

32 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

2

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

45.8 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

350 MHz

-

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

750 MHz

-

Shader Units

256

-

Texture Units

16

-

Raster Operation Units

8

-

Execution Units

16

-

Power Consumption

6 W

-

Graphics Performance

0.24 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

-

Official Website

Intel Celeron N4500

5.0

PCIe Version

3.0

28

PCIe Lanes

8

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Pentium Silver N5000

3

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus

4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i7 12850HX

5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i7 10610U

6

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

7

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i7 1365U

8

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i5 1340P

9

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i5 1030NG7

10

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster