Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Apple M3 Pro

VS

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

Apple M3 Pro

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with 24 cores 2.8GHz and Apple M3 Pro with 12 cores 4.05GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 3 months late

Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4.0)

Apple M3 Pro 's Advantages

Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 6400)

Larger memory bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)

Higher base frequency (4.05GHz vs 2.8GHz)

Lower TDP (30W vs 55W)

Score

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

VS

Apple M3 Pro

General Parameters

Jan 2025

Release Date

Oct 2023

Intel

Manufacturer

Apple

Laptop

Type

Laptop

-

Instruction Set

ARMv8

Arrow Lake

Core Architecture

Apple M3

Intel Socket 1851

Socket

Apple M-Socket

Arc Xe-LPG

Integrated Graphics

Apple M3 Pro GPU (19-core)

Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake)

Generation

-

Package

-

Transistor Count

37 billions

3 nm

Manufacturing Process

3 nm

17-55 W

Power Consumption

30 W

100 °C

Peak Operating Temperature

100°C

Intel

Foundry

-

CPU Performance

8

Performance Cores

6

8

Performance Core Threads

6

2.8 GHz

Performance Core Base Frequency

4.05 GHz

5.5 GHz

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.05 GHz

16

Efficiency Cores

6

16

Efficiency Core Threads

6

2.1 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

2.75 GHz

4.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency

2.57 GHz

24

Total Core Count

12

24

Total Thread Count

12

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

-

28

Multiplier

40x

112 KB per core

L1 Cache

192 K per core

23 MB

L2 Cache

16 MB shared

24 MB shared

L3 Cache

-

No

Unlocked Multiplier

No

1

SMP

-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400

Memory Types

LPDDR5-6400

256 GB

Max Memory Size

36 GB

2

Max Memory Channels

3

102.4 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

153.6 GB/s

Yes

ECC Memory Support

No

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

-

GPU Base Frequency

500 MHz

2000 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

1600 MHz

-

Shader Units

2304

-

Texture Units

144

-

Raster Operation Units

72

64

Execution Units

288

-

Graphics Performance

7.4 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

Official Website

-

5

PCIe Version

4.0

PCIe Lanes

-

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Intel Core i7 11370H

2

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

3

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS

4

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX

5

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Intel Core i5 1345U

6

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

7

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Intel Core 5 120U

8

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Intel Core i7 14650HX

9

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

10

Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Intel Core 5 120UL

Related News

1

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

2

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

3

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

4

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

5

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

6

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

7

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

8

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

9

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

10

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes