Intel Processor N97 vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

VS

Intel Processor N97

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Processor N97 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX with 8 cores 3.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Processor N97 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4266)

Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 68.27GB/s)

Lower TDP (12W vs 54W)

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 's Advantages

Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 6MB)

More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Processor N97

971

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX +52%

1481

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Processor N97

2986

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX +328%

12793

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Intel Processor N97

1229

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX +62%

1993

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Intel Processor N97

2802

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX +232%

9310

Blender

Intel Processor N97

33

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX +548%

214

Passmark CPU Single Core

Intel Processor N97

2139

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX +48%

3183

Passmark CPU Multi Core

Intel Processor N97

5957

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX +282%

22772

Intel Processor N97

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

General Parameters

Jan 2023

Release Date

Jan 2021

Intel

Manufacturer

AMD

Laptop

Type

Laptop

x86-64

Instruction Set

x86-64

Alder Lake

Core Architecture

Cezanne

N97

Processor Number

-

BGA-1264

Socket

FP6

UHD Graphics (24EU)

Integrated Graphics

Radeon RX Vega 8

Package

10 nm

Manufacturing Process

7 nm

12 W

Power Consumption

35-54 W

105°C

Peak Operating Temperature

105 °C

CPU Performance

-

Performance Cores

8

-

Performance Core Threads

16

Performance Core Base Frequency

3.3 GHz

-

Performance Core Turbo Frequency

4.6 GHz

4

Efficiency Cores

-

4

Efficiency Core Threads

-

3.6 GHz

Efficiency Core Base Frequency

-

4

Total Core Count

8

4

Total Thread Count

16

100 MHz

Bus Frequency

100 MHz

36x

Multiplier

33x

96 K per core

L1 Cache

64 K per core

2 MB shared

L2 Cache

512 K per core

6 MB shared

L3 Cache

16 MB shared

No

Unlocked Multiplier

Yes

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-4800

Memory Types

DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266

16 GB

Max Memory Size

64 GB

1

Max Memory Channels

2

76.8 GB/s

Max Memory Bandwidth

68.27 GB/s

No

ECC Memory Support

Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true

Integrated Graphics

true

1200 MHz

GPU Max Dynamic Frequency

2100 MHz

256

Shader Units

512

16

Texture Units

32

8

Raster Operation Units

8

24

Execution Units

-

10 W

Power Consumption

15 W

0.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Performance

-

Miscellaneous

Intel Processor N97

Official Website

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

3.0

PCIe Version

3.0

9

PCIe Lanes

16

Related CPU Comparisons

1

Intel Processor N97 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

2

Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Core i5 11300H

3

Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Celeron N4020

4

Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Celeron N3350E

5

Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Core i7 6820HQ

6

Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Core i3 1220P

7

Intel Processor N97 vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600U

8

Intel Processor N97 vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

9

Intel Processor N97 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

10

Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Core i5 8250U

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster