Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs AMD EPYC 9575F

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs AMD EPYC 9575F

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 with 4 cores 3.7GHz and AMD EPYC 9575F with 64 cores 3.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 3.3GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 400W)
AMD EPYC 9575F 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 1866)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 22nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Sep 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ivy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

1.86 billions
Transistor Count
66.52 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
400 W
70 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
257 mm²
Die Size
8x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
64
-
Performance Core Threads
128
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
4
Total Core Count
64
8
Total Thread Count
128
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
37.0
Multiplier
33.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3-1866
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
4
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
3
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy