Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 vs AMD EPYC 7F32

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 vs AMD EPYC 7F32

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 with 4 cores 3.5GHz and AMD EPYC 7F32 with 8 cores 3.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (140W vs 180W)
AMD EPYC 7F32 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2133)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 3.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 22nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3
1092
AMD EPYC 7F32 +16%
1267
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3
3974
AMD EPYC 7F32 +104%
8117
VS

General Parameters

Sep 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EP
Core Architecture
Rome
Intel Socket 2011-3
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))

Package

2.6 billions
Transistor Count
3.8 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
140 W
Power Consumption
180 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
356 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

CPU Performance

3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
37.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
4
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
40
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy