Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs AMD EPYC 8434PN

Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs AMD EPYC 8434PN

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and AMD EPYC 8434PN with 48 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 155W)
AMD EPYC 8434PN 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 32nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Mar 2012
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

1.27 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
155 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
85 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
294 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
4
Total Core Count
48
8
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
20.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy