Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201

Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 1.5GHz)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
690
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 +14%
789
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620 +21%
2533
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
VS

General Parameters

Mar 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))

Package

1.27 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
30 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
294 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²

CPU Performance

3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
32

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy