Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC 9475F

Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC 9475F

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 3120A with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9475F with 48 cores 3.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Phi 3120A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 400W)
AMD EPYC 9475F 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.65GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 22nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Turin
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
66.52 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
400 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
8x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
48
-
Performance Core Threads
96
1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.65 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
57
Total Core Count
48
228
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
36.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy