Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC 9825

Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC 9825

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 3120A with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Phi 3120A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 390W)
AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Turin
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
390 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
144
-
Performance Core Threads
288
1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
57
Total Core Count
144
228
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
21.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy