Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

Intel Xeon Phi 3120A vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 3120A with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Phi 3120A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654P 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Genoa
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
360 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
57
Total Core Count
96
228
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
24.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy