Intel Xeon Phi 7210F vs AMD EPYC 7642
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7210F with 64 cores 1.3GHz and AMD EPYC 7642 with 48 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 7642 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.3GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (225W vs 230W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2016
Release Date
Aug 2019
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Rome
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))
Package
8 billions
Transistor Count
3.8 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
230 W
Power Consumption
225 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
74 mm²
CPU Performance
1.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
64
Total Core Count
48
256
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
13.0
Multiplier
24.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
-
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
4
