Intel Xeon Phi 7250 vs AMD EPYC 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7250 with 68 cores 1.4GHz and AMD EPYC 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 8324P 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (180W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon Phi 7250
162
AMD EPYC 8324P
+927%
1664
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon Phi 7250
2414
AMD EPYC 8324P
+452%
13349
General Parameters
Jun 2016
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
8 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
215 W
Power Consumption
180 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
75 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
1.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
68
Total Core Count
32
272
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
14.0
Multiplier
26.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96
