Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 7250 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9124

Intel Xeon Phi 7250 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9124

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7250 with 68 cores 1.4GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 with 16 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (200W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon Phi 7250
162
AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 +1116%
1970
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon Phi 7250
2414
AMD EPYC Embedded 9124 +590%
16674
VS

General Parameters

Jun 2016
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

8 billions
Transistor Count
26.28 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
215 W
Power Consumption
200 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
68
Total Core Count
16
272
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
14.0
Multiplier
30.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy